Vaping Chip Supplier Tuoer Micro Ends IPO; Previously Faced Over RMB 30 Million Claim From Jinjia Ov
Business concentrated in e-cigarette field: the main products of Tuoer Micro, such as Airflow Sensor module and e-cigarette MCU solution board, both accounted for more than 69% of the total revenue.
"Package" deal raises doubts: Tuoer Micro signed a capacity cooperation agreement with Huawei Holdings, the controlling shareholder of supplier China Resources Shanghua. This is regarded as a package deal, caused the Shenzhen Stock Exchange for the existence of improper trading doubts.
Policy impact continues to ferment: in March 2022, the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration issued the "Measures for the Administration of Electronic Cigarettes", which set the entry threshold for the e-cigarette industry, stipulating that to engage in e-cigarettes-related production and business activities, you need to obtain the license for tobacco monopoly manufacturers, and you should have the capital, technology, and equipment, etc., and the establishment of e-cigarettes-related manufacturing enterprises and the expansion of production shall be subject to approval of the State Council's administrative department of tobacco monopoly. The establishment and expansion of e-cigarette-related production enterprises are subject to the approval of the State Council's tobacco monopoly administrative department.
Market Reassessment of Supplier Risks: The legal proceedings of Tuoer Micro and the review of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange may make e-cigarette companies reassess the stability and reliability of their suppliers, and thus be more prudent in selecting suppliers of integrated circuits.
Notably, Tuoer Microelectronics has been hit with two consecutive lawsuits. The first case came from Jinjia Technology, claiming that the quality of the airflow sensors sold by Tuoer, claiming 30,539,000 yuan and litigation costs; the second case was initiated by Suzhou Jianwei, accusing Tuoer of using a similar trademark, "TMI", and infringing on its registered trademark rights, demanding compensation of 2 million yuan. The second case was initiated by Suzhou Jianwei, which accused Tuoer of using a similar trademark "TMI", infringing its registered trademark right, and demanded compensation of 2 million RMB and cessation of infringing behavior.



