FREEDOM Atomizer Review
FREEDOM Atomizer Review: Designed by well-known domestic enthusiast Huodudu, the FREEDOM atomizer is a product that delivers a highly engaging user experience. Its appearance, inspired by the Gundam anime aesthetic, has also made it popular among users wh
FREEDOM Atomizer Review: Designed by the well-known domestic player Dudu, the FREEDOM atomizer is a product with a high level of experience. Its appearance, inspired by the anime Gundam, is also highly favored by players for its aesthetic appeal. As time has passed and small vaping devices have become prevalent, Dudu has remained committed to the sentiments of players and has resolutely launched the V1.5 version of the FREEDOM atomizer - GOLDAM.
The V1.5 version is uniquely named GOLDAM, which has a meaning similar to the English name of Gundam (GUNDAM), and can also be humorously interpreted as "dog egg" or "golden egg". This is what the designer Dudu told me. This amusing Chinese name truly amplifies the playful psychology of players to the maximum extent, which is quite fun!
Upon opening, it can be seen that there is not much difference from the original FREEDOM atomizer. The iconic installation diagram still resembles assembling a Gundam model.
The main components are shown in the image above. The craftsmanship of version 1.0 was already quite good, and this time the 1.5 dog egg version has further upgrades.
After assembly, you can see this "peculiar" shape. As the body does not have any obvious differences from the previous version, the uniquely non-mainstream design of the drip tip brings a significant visual impact, which is quite interesting.
Dudu mentioned that with this drip tip, its shape resembles Gundam even more. However, in my opinion, its shape leans more towards one-eyed mechs like Sazabi or Newtype.
In terms of usage, there are definitely no issues. The slanted design of the drip tip provides an alternative experience while using it. This aspect can only be truly appreciated by the user themselves; it's hard to explain in words, but I can say it is indeed not as you might imagine, and it works very well.
Of course, for conservative players, it still provides a conventional drip tip that came with version 1.0.
Aside from the drip tip, the internal structure of the top cover is another change. It adopts a design with locking points on both sides to secure the top cover, and the oversized sealing ring inside is also quite distinctive. However, in actual experience, if the atomizer is brand new, the process of tightening this locking point can be somewhat "difficult" because without using a bit of e-liquid as lubrication, it requires significant downward pressure to secure it. Although this issue does not persist in subsequent uses, I personally find it a minor drawback.
Moving to the tank section, you can see that the logo has some differences.
As for the base, it remains unchanged from the previous version and is still very functional.
In fact, the "dog egg" performs excellently in terms of experience, and the new drip tip brings a different sensation and a 100% return rate. However, in conclusion, I want to discuss the future direction of products catering to this type of player. After all, in today's market, small vaping devices have returned to the essence of electronic cigarettes and are leading the way. Previously popular player-oriented products have now become a niche category. Whether they sell well is not the main point, as for most brands or individual practitioners, money is the only goal. Discussing sentiment while disregarding support seems too far-fetched.
So, under the current circumstances, the "dog egg" still stubbornly pushes into the domestic market. One can only say that the designer remains highly committed to devices for big cloud players. I once asked him if he was worried about losses with this atomizer. He seemed to express a relatively helpless sentiment, perhaps reflecting the current market trends. As for whether big cloud devices will revive in the future, we can only wait until electronic cigarettes become more widespread and player-oriented products are developed into a high-end niche market. After all, we see various domestic brands securing funding and articles proclaiming that more and more people are starting to use electronic cigarettes, creating an illusion of prosperity. However, the reality is that the domestic economy has already begun to decline sharply over the past two years, and this impact will be even more pronounced this year and next. For a product like electronic cigarettes, which still has unique characteristics, a decline in sales is inevitable, and the number of actual buyers remains just the tip of the iceberg. Not to mention the content in those "news" articles, it is still far fewer than you might imagine.
The V1.5 version is uniquely named GOLDAM, which has a meaning similar to the English name of Gundam (GUNDAM), and can also be humorously interpreted as "dog egg" or "golden egg". This is what the designer Dudu told me. This amusing Chinese name truly amplifies the playful psychology of players to the maximum extent, which is quite fun!
Upon opening, it can be seen that there is not much difference from the original FREEDOM atomizer. The iconic installation diagram still resembles assembling a Gundam model.
The main components are shown in the image above. The craftsmanship of version 1.0 was already quite good, and this time the 1.5 dog egg version has further upgrades.After assembly, you can see this "peculiar" shape. As the body does not have any obvious differences from the previous version, the uniquely non-mainstream design of the drip tip brings a significant visual impact, which is quite interesting.
Dudu mentioned that with this drip tip, its shape resembles Gundam even more. However, in my opinion, its shape leans more towards one-eyed mechs like Sazabi or Newtype.
In terms of usage, there are definitely no issues. The slanted design of the drip tip provides an alternative experience while using it. This aspect can only be truly appreciated by the user themselves; it's hard to explain in words, but I can say it is indeed not as you might imagine, and it works very well.
Of course, for conservative players, it still provides a conventional drip tip that came with version 1.0.
Aside from the drip tip, the internal structure of the top cover is another change. It adopts a design with locking points on both sides to secure the top cover, and the oversized sealing ring inside is also quite distinctive. However, in actual experience, if the atomizer is brand new, the process of tightening this locking point can be somewhat "difficult" because without using a bit of e-liquid as lubrication, it requires significant downward pressure to secure it. Although this issue does not persist in subsequent uses, I personally find it a minor drawback.Moving to the tank section, you can see that the logo has some differences.
As for the base, it remains unchanged from the previous version and is still very functional.
In fact, the "dog egg" performs excellently in terms of experience, and the new drip tip brings a different sensation and a 100% return rate. However, in conclusion, I want to discuss the future direction of products catering to this type of player. After all, in today's market, small vaping devices have returned to the essence of electronic cigarettes and are leading the way. Previously popular player-oriented products have now become a niche category. Whether they sell well is not the main point, as for most brands or individual practitioners, money is the only goal. Discussing sentiment while disregarding support seems too far-fetched.So, under the current circumstances, the "dog egg" still stubbornly pushes into the domestic market. One can only say that the designer remains highly committed to devices for big cloud players. I once asked him if he was worried about losses with this atomizer. He seemed to express a relatively helpless sentiment, perhaps reflecting the current market trends. As for whether big cloud devices will revive in the future, we can only wait until electronic cigarettes become more widespread and player-oriented products are developed into a high-end niche market. After all, we see various domestic brands securing funding and articles proclaiming that more and more people are starting to use electronic cigarettes, creating an illusion of prosperity. However, the reality is that the domestic economy has already begun to decline sharply over the past two years, and this impact will be even more pronounced this year and next. For a product like electronic cigarettes, which still has unique characteristics, a decline in sales is inevitable, and the number of actual buyers remains just the tip of the iceberg. Not to mention the content in those "news" articles, it is still far fewer than you might imagine.
