Ploom S Vaping Device and glo Vaping Device Comparison Review: Which Is Best for You?
In January 2019, JT Japan Tobacco launched the company’s first high-temperature heated tobacco Ploom S, as well as the low-temperature heated tobacco Ploom Tech Plus. Like BAT’s glo, Ploom S also uses a “surround heating” method that heats the dedicated s
In January 2019, JT Japan Tobacco launched the company’s first high-temperature heated tobacco device, the “Ploom S,” as well as the low-temperature heated tobacco device “Ploom Tech Plus.”
Like the “glo” introduced by British American Tobacco (BAT), the “Ploom S” also uses a peripheral heating method that heats the dedicated tobacco sticks from the outside.
This time, we’re comparing the “Ploom S” and “glo” to see which one suits you best.
Although both the “Ploom S” and “glo” are common peripheral-heating heated tobacco devices, they differ greatly in machine “heating temperature,” “number of consecutive uses,” and the number of pod flavors available.
The heating temperature of the Ploom S is about 200°C, while the glo heats to about 240°C, a difference of roughly 40°C. The higher the temperature, the stronger the flavor becomes, but the stronger the odor becomes as well.
At around 200°C, the Ploom S produces less odor while still ensuring a certain level of flavor. In other words, the Ploom S is a device that emphasizes odor reduction, while the glo is designed with flavor intensity as the priority.
A fully charged Ploom S can be used 10 times consecutively. By contrast, the glo can be used 30 times on a full charge, a threefold difference between the two.
The Ploom S and glo are roughly similar in size and weight. Both are palm-sized and easy to carry, so there is no major difference in portability.
The Ploom S was released in January 2019. As of April 2019, there were only three kinds of tobacco sticks available.
Although the limited number of flavors is a drawback, there is still room for further expansion in this area.
Since glo was launched earlier and offers two tobacco stick brands, KENT and NEW, there are many flavor options to choose from.
KENT has 10 flavors and NEW has 8, so being able to choose your favorite from 18 options is a major advantage.
After confirming the differences between the two models, let’s compare the inhalation experience.
First, the Ploom S does not produce much vapor and has the least odor among high-temperature heated tobacco products.
Even in a closed room, if you use two or three tobacco sticks in a row, people around you are unlikely to mind. However, once the heating progresses, the flavor becomes weaker.
On the other hand, although the glo does not produce much vapor either, it delivers a strong flavor and, most importantly, provides a level of satisfaction closer to traditional cigarettes.
It is worth noting that because the odor is quite strong, it is not suitable for use in enclosed rooms.
Comparing the Ploom S and glo, the Ploom S has overwhelmingly less odor, making it more suitable for environments where smell is a concern.
If you want a stronger flavor and a sensation closer to smoking traditional cigarettes, then you should choose glo without hesitation.
Like the “glo” introduced by British American Tobacco (BAT), the “Ploom S” also uses a peripheral heating method that heats the dedicated tobacco sticks from the outside.
This time, we’re comparing the “Ploom S” and “glo” to see which one suits you best.
Although both the “Ploom S” and “glo” are common peripheral-heating heated tobacco devices, they differ greatly in machine “heating temperature,” “number of consecutive uses,” and the number of pod flavors available.
The heating temperature of the Ploom S is about 200°C, while the glo heats to about 240°C, a difference of roughly 40°C. The higher the temperature, the stronger the flavor becomes, but the stronger the odor becomes as well.
At around 200°C, the Ploom S produces less odor while still ensuring a certain level of flavor. In other words, the Ploom S is a device that emphasizes odor reduction, while the glo is designed with flavor intensity as the priority.
A fully charged Ploom S can be used 10 times consecutively. By contrast, the glo can be used 30 times on a full charge, a threefold difference between the two.
The Ploom S and glo are roughly similar in size and weight. Both are palm-sized and easy to carry, so there is no major difference in portability.
The Ploom S was released in January 2019. As of April 2019, there were only three kinds of tobacco sticks available.
Although the limited number of flavors is a drawback, there is still room for further expansion in this area.
Since glo was launched earlier and offers two tobacco stick brands, KENT and NEW, there are many flavor options to choose from.
KENT has 10 flavors and NEW has 8, so being able to choose your favorite from 18 options is a major advantage.
After confirming the differences between the two models, let’s compare the inhalation experience.
First, the Ploom S does not produce much vapor and has the least odor among high-temperature heated tobacco products.
Even in a closed room, if you use two or three tobacco sticks in a row, people around you are unlikely to mind. However, once the heating progresses, the flavor becomes weaker.
On the other hand, although the glo does not produce much vapor either, it delivers a strong flavor and, most importantly, provides a level of satisfaction closer to traditional cigarettes.
It is worth noting that because the odor is quite strong, it is not suitable for use in enclosed rooms.
Comparing the Ploom S and glo, the Ploom S has overwhelmingly less odor, making it more suitable for environments where smell is a concern.
If you want a stronger flavor and a sensation closer to smoking traditional cigarettes, then you should choose glo without hesitation.
