Is the RELX one device plus three pods set genuine? Can counterfeit RELX products also be scanned fo

Recently, I have received multiple feedbacks from customers stating that someone is selling the "one device plus three pods" RELX first-generation set in social circles, claiming it is genuine and can be scanned for rewards points, along with actual photos.

So where do these so-called "genuine" RELX first-generation sets come from? Are they real?

First, we need to clarify one point: since its launch, RELX has never released a "one device plus three pods" set on its official website. Up to now, the official has only sold two configurations of the first-generation set: one is a "one device plus two pods" set, and the other is a single device co-branded version. Besides these two, there is also a single device for after-sales replacement, which is generally not sold to the public, making it difficult to enter the market.

For the so-called "one device plus three pods" combination set sold by social sellers, there are likely two main scenarios:

One is the "one device plus three pods set." This situation can basically be determined as counterfeit, as I mentioned above, the RELX first-generation set has never had a "one device plus three pods" configuration, meaning this configuration cannot possibly come from the RELX manufacturer.

The second is "one device + three pods." Counterfeit sellers may mix and match genuine pods with fake devices for sale. Since the pods are genuine, they can be verified through official scanning, so customers are often misled into thinking they have purchased genuine products. This is also why many social sellers claim that their "one device plus three pods" can be scanned for verification.

As for those sellers using "fake pods + fake devices," they can only deceive newcomers; they are basically doing one-time business.

Therefore, if you encounter social sellers selling the RELX "one device plus three pods," please be vigilant. Do not compromise your health for a moment of cheapness, as it would not be worth the loss.