Are e-cigarettes a threat or a miracle?

I have heard many such examples:

After seeing the effects of e-cigarettes, some people resolutely bought e-cigarettes and began to replace them. At first, she said excitedly that her breathing was smoother, she stopped coughing when she got up in the morning, and she could reduce her dependence on cigarettes.

But within a few days, he had already switched back to cigarettes: "A program has reported that e-cigarettes are more toxic than cigarettes."

?

Since its first day of existence, e-cigarettes have been accompanied by constant controversy. Every once in a while, research results from certain institutions appear to prove the toxicity of e-cigarettes.

?

The authenticity of this information cannot be verified, but it is clearMost of them are taken out of context and exaggerated factsthe results. But even this is enough to destroy people's psychological defenses.

Are the facts really what the media said? Obviously not!

?

The British BBC has produced a documentary about e-cigarettes-"E-Cigarettes: Miracle or Threat". This is the first time that an authoritative organization has conducted a systematic study of the dangers of e-cigarettes.

#p#Pagination Title #e#Existing research data shows that the harm of e-cigarettes to the human body is only about 5% of that of cigarettes.

?

Is it a miracle or a threat? Let's break it down one by one!

- Aldehyde hazard theory-

?

A report in Japan stated that "formaldehyde was found in a product ten times higher than cigarettes."

?

However, the maximum power was used in the test, and each breath was inhaled for 3-4 seconds.In fact, users will not inhale continuously for 4 seconds with power above 200W during normal use, unless you have developed iron lungs.

?

Under normal circumstances, the power will remain at 20- 80W, and each inhale lasts an average of 2 seconds. There have been no cases of vaper being exposed to high formaldehyde.?

-PG propylene glycol is harmful-

?

Propylene glycol will have a slight irritating effect on the respiratory system, but just breathe more fresh air and rest.

?# p#pagination title #e#

?

- The theory that nicotine is harmful-

People often confuse nicotine with tar. In fact, nicotine is not the real killer of cancer. It has always been the blame for tar and carbon monoxide. Nicotine is widely found in tomatoes and eggplants.

?

Research reports have also shown that the nicotine content released into the air by e-cigarettes is only 1/1000 of that of cigarettes, and the nicotine content in people who smoke second-hand steam is only equivalent to that of eating tomatoes.

- Lung bulla theory-

?

The thing is that after using e-cigarettes for a period of time, the victim found that he was sick. After going to the hospital for an examination, he found large pulmonary blisters in his lungs, and immediately blamed all the blame on the e-cigarettes.

?

However, bullae are generally secondary to inflammatory lesions in the small bronchi. During long-term cigarette use, the victim may have caused inflammation of the small bronchus. Bronchitis slowly worsened, and pulmonary bullae immediately appeared.

?

In addition, among hundreds of thousands of e-cigarette users in China, there are no other examples of causing pulmonary bullae.

?

Many rumors that are not supported by actual theory can actually be solved with a little deliberation.

?

In any case, the physical problems caused by e-cigarettes are orders of magnitude less than those caused by cigarettes.

?

Here, we welcome everyone to join us to change people's views on e-cigarettes. Only in this way can e-cigarettes develop healthily, bring benefits to more smokers, and help us no longer be lonely on the road to vape.