How to Write a Vaping Product Review?

 How to write the e-cigarette evaluation? As a cute newcomer, he likes to discuss and learn when he has nothing to do, and he has also read a lot of public tests and is slightly interested. As a newbie, I want to know what a digital data product is. I can just go directly to the Baidu manual for this product. Why should I read a review and public beta? I just want to see how other players feel about using it and how satisfied they are with the product. What makes people uncomfortable? Thanks for a public beta product, thanks to the factory, thanks, etc. It's normal. After all, there is no platform and no opportunity, but it's good to trouble you to use snacks. Don't mix the prizes to mix the prizes. The public beta gives you, you can take some responsibility to the other players. Let us also really understand this product. I don't think there is a need to put together a package for the entire half of the product. It's not professional. I have to say semi-professional, unprofessional, and professional words. Those words can easily mislead us, okay?

  In fact, no matter whether it is evaluation, experience, or unpacking, what you need most as a post reader is the experience of using it! All five fingers are long and short, let alone the feeling!   What's the use of copying and typesetting, writing instructions, and official introductions from manufacturers over and over again? People nowadays don't know how to Baidu? Can't read the official website? Don't know how to use translation software? However, this kind of person is the one who mixes the best and takes the most things. It is also called evaluation!   What's more, a few drops of tobacco oil will produce a so-called tobacco oil review, and then the product information will clearly state what he smoked 1ml. Is he a chicken, 1ml?   Most of the people who write about their feelings are non-professional players, and they are not engaged in the e-cigarette industry. They all stay at the level of feeling and experience.   I really want to ask, can you take responsibility for the two words of evaluation? Is it the right keyboard to type? Once you copy the typesetting, write the official language, and point a few points on the insignificant shortcomings, you will become a professional reviewer!   The world is declining day by day, and people's hearts are not as old as they are. Everyone can write something, but don't feel complacent about yourself.   For that so-called false reputation? In order to hook up with those so-called reviewers?   What I have always wanted to do is very simple. Even if one person sees the experience posts I write, he will have this situation. It is enough to help communication and discussion.   I can't afford to evaluate, so I don't dare to flaunt these so-called two words.   But I also despise those so-called reviews,   It's not that my eyes are high, at least wait until you stop writing instructions!   First: Evaluate the significance of the article! What do we write reviews for? Who has considered this question? Is it to be cool, to praise and praise the tested subjects? Or is it to show off his writing ability?   If you want to become a qualified or professional evaluator, this issue must be considered.   First of all, the positioning of the evaluation article is to start from the perspective of ordinary players. If you are a user or someone who wants to buy the product under test, what issues do you care about most?   A professional and mature reviewer will find various different points and explain these points to attract readers to read your article step by step from superficial to deep. A successful evaluation will allow readers to at least learn some knowledge after reading it, or by reading your evaluation, they will get precise reference to determine whether the product being tested is suitable for their purchase and use.   Therefore, the essence of a professional and mature evaluation article is to tell you the advantages and disadvantages of the product being tested and the actual experience of using it.   An evaluation article with inaccurate positioning has the same effect as a table of Manchu and Han seats placed in front of Buddhists.“”“” The evaluator must first know what kind of people will read your evaluation articles. People who eat vegetarian foods will certainly not go to a meat banquet. Therefore, people who want to read your article will inevitably be related to the product being tested.   Either people who have been paying attention to such products for a long time, people who want to buy them, or people who are hesitant among several similar products, want to use your evaluation to refer to them, or even decide whether to buy the product under test. Therefore, the evaluator is actually responsible. After an evaluation article is published, it not only completes the evaluation task, but its impact is also very extensive and far-reaching.   Your fans and readers will use your evaluation articles as a benchmark and reference to decide whether to start a product. If the review article contains exaggeration, or if there are product flaws that are deliberately ignored and not written, then the player will make the decision whether to start the product through your article.   If the actual experience after purchase is inconsistent with what is introduced in the evaluation article, then readers will not blame the merchants and manufacturers first. The first person to blame is the author of the evaluation article! Whether this phenomenon is caused intentionally or unintentionally by the reviewer, readers will believe that it is the reviewer's responsibility.   Therefore, the first point of evaluation should be to look at the problem from the user's perspective, and then use the author's professional knowledge and unique insights to explain some relevant content to everyone. Secondly, the evaluation should be fair and do not deliberately exaggerate or belittle the strengths and weaknesses of the tested subjects. Just express the results of your actual use and testing directly, and the reader will judge for himself.   Third, evaluation articles must be professional. Professional evaluation articles are standards that reflect the level of an author and evaluator. For example, if you ask a person who has never used e-cigarettes to write an evaluation, take the so-called report by the "Xinhua Agency" in the previous stage as an example. Reports written by a group of people who don't understand e-cigarettes do not have any problems in the eyes of ordinary people. Everyone's feeling is, it turns out that e-cigarettes are like this. They cannot quit smoking or replace cigarettes. The nicotine content of cigarette oil is not standard or standardized, which is harmful to the human body, etc.——……   But is this actually the case? Let alone the reviewers, even newbies who have just been in the trap for a month will scoff at the above reports. Because in the circle, people who know the industry think this report is worthless. It can be seen at a glance that it was made by people who don't understand e-cigarettes at all. Therefore, assessors should pay attention to improving their professionalism and rigor at all times. After all, people reading your evaluation articles are not only novices, but also many professional advanced players. Unprofessional articles, in their opinion, are as effective as the above example!   Fourth: Evaluate the seriousness of the article. First of all, I have no objection to the unique style of each author and reviewer. How to make boring evaluation articles very vivid is also the pursuit of every reviewer. If you don't have your own style, it will be difficult for readers to have the enthusiasm to continue reading the highly stylized evaluation articles.“”   For example, if ten reviewers all follow the same pattern to write assessments, then readers will feel that they read the ten assessment articles will be the same and lack new ideas, just like ten articles written by one person. Therefore, each evaluator must establish his own style and gradually improve it. However, the evaluation articles are very serious and targeted. So in terms of structure, try to remove some content that has little to do with the evaluation itself. Because everyone is here to see the actual content and experience effect of the evaluation article, not to see the author make regular remarks.   Moreover, many people in the website evaluation style recently are pursuing the so-called artistic conception.“” This is actually a good thing, because everyone is starting to think about style. This in itself is worth encouraging. But the story of walking in Han tells us that if you deliberately imitate it, you will only lose your own style in the end.“” Other people's writing style and artistic conception may be very good, but they are their own characteristics and their heartfelt and easy-to-use style, just as natural and skillful as breathing. If you deliberately imitate it, not only will it not have good results, but it will eventually turn your article into something different, making it feel very bad to read.“”   After saying these four points, many people are confused. So how should the evaluation article be written?   First of all, don't rush to review a product after you get it. Because the product is not fully understood, the evaluation article will not be very comprehensive and correct, and there will inevitably be omissions and mistakes. The effect of such an article is worse than not publishing it. If you want to grab the launch, catch up with timeliness, and occupy the first time among similar media, you can start with an open-box article, with simple parameter introductions and preliminary experience. In this way, we can not only get the first shot, but also ensure that there are no major mistakes and deviations in the overall article. Moreover, after you fully understand the product in the later period, you can release more comprehensive and accurate evaluations based on the advantages and disadvantages you have experienced.   Not every product can only be written for one article. Evaluators need to learn to grasp the points. Each product has different points that can be used to evaluate and compare. For example, smok's mini box and Kleipen's mini + are positioned as temperature control and mini, and the power is both within the same range. So let's start from the actual perspective of the players. If we, as newcomers, want to buy a set of pit entry equipment, select it for a long time, and finally want to choose between mini + and smok at the same price and general performance, then what will we pay attention to?   These are the points. We can seize these points and run through the main line of the evaluation article. Finally, we will summarize which box is suitable for users with what needs, the differences between the two, the author's own opinions, etc. Such an article is very practical and valuable for readers. This is a practical and valuable success evaluation article.   Secondly, the article must first be fair. Justice does not mean moderation. The first is to use words, try not to use the most arbitrary and absolute words.“”“”“”“” For example, when writing an atomizer, don't use very subjective words such as the best taste and none.“”“” For the mainframe, do not use subjective terms such as good workmanship, the most accurate output, and the most stable temperature control.“” Regarding the specific situation, the evaluation author only needs to express it according to the actual experience results, and the reader will make the judgment for himself.   Unless it is some particularly excellent products, after long-term use and comparison, if you are confident that they are indeed very good at the current stage, then you can boldly evaluate them, but the premise is to fully understand the products and compare them. Conclusion drawn after multiple similar products. Good products really need to be understood by players. If they are really excellent products, then boldly recommend them to readers.   Third: To whom are the evaluation articles written? The merchant has provided you with test samples, so should we exaggerate the product through articles to repay the manufacturer?“”   We write evaluations mainly for readers and players. Only they are your starting point and foundation. Imagine if every article was written in the direction the merchant liked, deliberately concealing and downplaying shortcomings, and exaggerating the effects and advantages, then the final article would not be a review, but an advertisement! Although the merchants are satisfied with this result, what about the readers? Readers originally used your evaluation to refer to it, but after purchasing, they found that their feelings were completely different from what was described in the evaluation article. Then over time, your credibility will also decrease.   Steam buses are players 'media, not merchants' billboards.“” If a player sees your article and doesn't need to read it, he will come to a conclusion. He wrote it, so don't need to read it. It must be a waste of time reading the soft article.&“…… rdquo;   Over time, a large number of readers and fans will be lost, and credibility and influence will also drop significantly. In this way, in the end, the manufacturer is unwilling to cooperate with an uninfluential evaluator. Therefore, the manufacturer is not afraid of you praising him, but afraid of you criticizing him. Of course, the prerequisite is that the criticism is correct and well-founded. You can't engage in so-called gangs.“”   Fourth, mentality issues. Nowadays, many people write assessments, often to cope with tasks and quickly complete the tasks. It is better not to write such an article. Because every time readers read your evaluation article, they will finally feel that they have not gained any knowledge or advice after reading it, so no one will read your article again in the future. Writing assessments is not a simple task. Instead, we should focus on the key points. Let readers spread it for you by evaluating articles. Increase your influence and popularity by evaluating articles. This is a healthy development path.   It not only conveys their opinions, understanding and feelings about the product to readers through articles, so that readers can have an objective and comprehensive understanding of the product and learn some knowledge. In the long run, readers will spread it for you. For example, your evaluation article is well written. Once a new product is released, your fans and readers will be very much looking forward to the opinions and opinions expressed in the evaluation article. Moreover, if a friend asks relevant questions later, he will also suggest others to read your evaluation article.   The speed and scope of this spread are astonishing. Therefore, evaluation should focus on content quality rather than quantity. The actual value of a connotative evaluation article is greater than 100 articles that have no nutrition. Readers will understand and learn 10 knowledge points or reference opinions through one of your articles, so will they still waste time reading 100 articles with no knowledge points?   Fifth, many people say that their copywriting is not good and their rhetoric is not perfect. In fact, the main purpose of evaluation is to clearly tell readers the advantages and disadvantages of the product, opinions and suggestions. There is no need for too much rhetoric and content that has no practical significance to the article. I used to like to modify articles a lot, but this actually made a mistake. Because such an article looks good on the surface, very gorgeous and beautiful, but after reading it, readers will find that there is not much actually useful content.   If you simply enjoy the pleasure of words bringing readers, you might as well read some excellent literary works. So I'm improving, too. But this does not mean simply shortening the article. It is also wrong. Concise and directness do not mean monotonous or boring. How to grasp this balance and establish your own style requires everyone to think, improve and try for themselves.   Finally, I hope that friends who really want to continue on the road of evaluation can think about how to conduct evaluation and how to establish their own system and style. Only by continuous improvement and improvement can we make ourselves more influential and vital. How can I write better evaluation articles?   I have been thinking, groping and improving. I would like to take this article to encourage you and hope that everyone can become excellent reviewers popular with readers! Introduce more good products to readers and let readers avoid some unnecessary cheating goods!   Finally, I hope that more and more friends who like evaluation and e-cigarettes can join the steam bus, and everyone will work together to let more people understand e-cigarettes and steam buses. Through our more professional and objective evaluation articles, we can help e-cigarette users better understand e-cigarette products and introduce more excellent products to more people!# p #pagination title #e #