Review of VVILD Vape Endorsed by Edison Chen
There was recent news that VVILD would be endorsed by Edison Chen. Earlier, reports had already emerged of Luo Yonghao and Edison Chen appearing together. According to the official VVILD announcement, Edison Chen will serve as the brand’s special creative
Recently, it was announced that VVILD vape will be endorsed by Edison Chen. There were previous reports of Luo Yonghao and Edison Chen appearing together. According to VVILD's official announcement, Edison Chen will serve as the special creative officer for the VVILD brand, participating in product and brand design, providing creativity and inspiration. Today, we will review the VVILD vape.
Test Product: VVILD
Test Quantity: 1 device, 2 pods
Tester A: Smokes one pack of traditional cigarettes daily, approximately 10-17 puffs per use of the test product.
Test Items: 10 major categories.
Item 1: Outer Packaging
(-2 points) The three pods have a unified flavor label, and one can only guess the flavor.
(+0 points) The outer packaging features a red and white zebra stripe.
(+0 points) Single-layer design, with the pod, device, and manual all in the same layer.
(-1 point) The instruction manual is extremely simple, almost non-existent.
Reviewer Comment: The three pods do not have separate flavor labels and only use a sticker to inform consumers of the flavor types. Although it is possible to distinguish by color, the first impression upon unboxing left a very poor impression on us testers. Negative review.
Item 2: Appearance Design
(+0 points) Type-C charging port.
(+0 points) Aluminum oxide process, not too heavy, and feels good in hand.
(+0 points) The air intake hole is positioned at the upper end, slightly higher than other products, rarely resulting in accidental blockage by fingers.
(+2 points) High-precision perforated breathing light, not easily noticed during normal use, only lights up when inhaling, very distinctive.
Reviewer Comment: The breathing light of VVILD is probably the biggest highlight of this product, especially in darker environments, the high-precision perforated breathing light looks very cool. Positive review.
Item 3: Battery Capacity
(+0 points) 350mAh (official specification, not tested), slightly higher than other products.
Item 4: Battery Life
(+0 points) Charging time: official 1 hour, actual test 55 minutes.
Reviewer Comment: The charging time reported by VVILD is basically consistent with the official data, which can be considered honest. However, the 1-hour charging time is significantly longer compared to other products on the market, which is frustrating. Neutral review.
Item 5: Pod Variety
(+0 points) The standard package includes 3 pods.
(+0 points) 8 flavors available, limited options, and many are non-mainstream.
Reviewer Comment: We tested relatively few of VVILD's pods. According to testers, the mint flavor requires a few more puffs to achieve satisfaction, while the mango flavor is completely unpalatable, and the tobacco flavor is too harsh. Overall, VVILD's flavor options for pods are not very ideal. Of course, taste is subjective. Currently, many of the flavors sold by the official store are non-mainstream, and although no points were deducted in the review, we were very dissatisfied with the results. Negative review.
Item 6: Oil Leakage
(+2 points) No obvious oil leakage.
Item 7: Pod Puff Count
(+1 point) Not officially stated, approximately 250-270 puffs.
#p#分页标题#e#
Reviewer Comment: The 2ml pod capacity is basically on par with similar products on the market. Our concept is that as long as the capacity is not overstated, we give +1 as encouragement. Neutral review.
Item 8: Cost Performance
(+0 points) Average cost is about 0.13 yuan per puff.
Item 9: Nicotine Content
(+0 points) 3%-5% (official specification, optional).
Item 10: Atomization Technology
(+0 points) Ceramic atomization core.
Reviewer Comment: Aside from the striking perforated breathing light, VVILD did not leave us with many other impressions, and the flavor can even be described as "terrible." We maintain a neutral stance on this highly subjective factor and will not provide a score. We only remind consumers in the comments at the end.
Overall Score: 2 points.
As usual, it's time for some benefits. If you need to test or wholesale VVILD vapes endorsed by Edison Chen, you can contact the official WeChat: vapeos or call: 15611665151.
Test Product: VVILD
Test Quantity: 1 device, 2 pods
Tester A: Smokes one pack of traditional cigarettes daily, approximately 10-17 puffs per use of the test product.
Test Items: 10 major categories.
Item 1: Outer Packaging
(-2 points) The three pods have a unified flavor label, and one can only guess the flavor.
(+0 points) The outer packaging features a red and white zebra stripe.
(+0 points) Single-layer design, with the pod, device, and manual all in the same layer.
(-1 point) The instruction manual is extremely simple, almost non-existent.
Reviewer Comment: The three pods do not have separate flavor labels and only use a sticker to inform consumers of the flavor types. Although it is possible to distinguish by color, the first impression upon unboxing left a very poor impression on us testers. Negative review.
Item 2: Appearance Design
(+0 points) Type-C charging port.
(+0 points) Aluminum oxide process, not too heavy, and feels good in hand.
(+0 points) The air intake hole is positioned at the upper end, slightly higher than other products, rarely resulting in accidental blockage by fingers.
(+2 points) High-precision perforated breathing light, not easily noticed during normal use, only lights up when inhaling, very distinctive.
Reviewer Comment: The breathing light of VVILD is probably the biggest highlight of this product, especially in darker environments, the high-precision perforated breathing light looks very cool. Positive review.
Item 3: Battery Capacity
(+0 points) 350mAh (official specification, not tested), slightly higher than other products.
Item 4: Battery Life
(+0 points) Charging time: official 1 hour, actual test 55 minutes.
Reviewer Comment: The charging time reported by VVILD is basically consistent with the official data, which can be considered honest. However, the 1-hour charging time is significantly longer compared to other products on the market, which is frustrating. Neutral review.
Item 5: Pod Variety
(+0 points) The standard package includes 3 pods.
(+0 points) 8 flavors available, limited options, and many are non-mainstream.
Reviewer Comment: We tested relatively few of VVILD's pods. According to testers, the mint flavor requires a few more puffs to achieve satisfaction, while the mango flavor is completely unpalatable, and the tobacco flavor is too harsh. Overall, VVILD's flavor options for pods are not very ideal. Of course, taste is subjective. Currently, many of the flavors sold by the official store are non-mainstream, and although no points were deducted in the review, we were very dissatisfied with the results. Negative review.
Item 6: Oil Leakage
(+2 points) No obvious oil leakage.
Item 7: Pod Puff Count
(+1 point) Not officially stated, approximately 250-270 puffs.
#p#分页标题#e#Reviewer Comment: The 2ml pod capacity is basically on par with similar products on the market. Our concept is that as long as the capacity is not overstated, we give +1 as encouragement. Neutral review.
Item 8: Cost Performance
(+0 points) Average cost is about 0.13 yuan per puff.
Item 9: Nicotine Content
(+0 points) 3%-5% (official specification, optional).
Item 10: Atomization Technology
(+0 points) Ceramic atomization core.
Reviewer Comment: Aside from the striking perforated breathing light, VVILD did not leave us with many other impressions, and the flavor can even be described as "terrible." We maintain a neutral stance on this highly subjective factor and will not provide a score. We only remind consumers in the comments at the end.
Overall Score: 2 points.
As usual, it's time for some benefits. If you need to test or wholesale VVILD vapes endorsed by Edison Chen, you can contact the official WeChat: vapeos or call: 15611665151.
